Why North Carolina is NOT a Battleground State

This blog is about Battlegrounds States and only Battleground States.  It is quite interesting that Barack Obama is below 50% in California and honestly it is a definite sign of weakness in the President’s re-elect chances.  However, the 2012 election battle will not be fought in California and even if through some miracle of tidal wave results Mitt Romney were to carry California, the 270 threshold necessary to win the Presidency will have long since been breached by carrying one of the identified Battleground states.

Which brings us to North Carolina.

The argument to call it a Battleground state is straight forward and not without merit.  Barack Obama won the state in 2008.  The DNC convention is in Charlotte, NC in late August/early September affording the Obama campaign almost limitless free media in the state during the run-up and through the convention. This should create plenty of momentum for Obama in the North Carolina.  And most importantly for a Battleground state, BOTH campaigns are currently in the state battling it out with TV, radio and internet ads — quite possibly the very definition of a Battleground!

All of this is true and I would expect nothing less of either campaign at this juncture — a full five months from the election.

But it is the mere fact that both campaigns are in North Carolina today but likely will not be there one month from now that gives me comfort that North Carolina is truly NOT a Battleground State.  The reasoning behind each campaign’s presence are completely opposite — Obama wants to see if he has a chance, Romney wants to put it to bed.  Each campaign is also approaching these spends from dramatically different positions of strength — Obama is overcoming a state party circular firing squad, Romney is outpacing a McCain campaign that never showed up in 2008.

Unlike the vast majority of Battleground polling you see showing Obama with a 2 – 5 point lead, the Real Clear Politics average in North Carolina is Romney +2.5. Critical analysis of the Battleground polls showing Obama leading reveals those races are more likely a dead heats or Romney is leading as in the case of Nevada.  Critical analysis of polling in North Carolina reveals Romney with a likely 6 – 8 point lead. It’s like the old saying about mainstream media polling: “If the poll shows the Democrat with a slight lead, it’s tied.  If the poll shows the race tied, the Republican is winning.  And if the poll shows the Republican winning? well then the race is over.” For example the Civitas poll showing Romney up 2 versus Obama last week had a party ID breakdown of Democrat 45, Republican 33 and Independent 22 or D +12 — a completely unheard of oversampling of Democrats. I fully expect polls in the coming days to confirm these increased margins.

Which brings me to why each campaign is in the state today and why this tells you North Carolina is not a Battleground state.  The Obama campaign is spending resources today in North Carolina to see if their pro-Obama or anti-Romney ads can move these under water poll numbers right now. They are test-marketing everything. They are intensely polling every demographic. The are scrutinizing every voter to see if there is any hope that the people of North Carolina are open to Obama’s message.  And if they cannot move that polling number right now or they do not find the citizens open either supporting the President or changing their support from Romney, they will immediately pull every resource and move it across the state line to the far more important state of Virginia. If this were a Battleground state they would fight for these votes from now through November.  That is not the case in North Carolina. The Obama campaign will make the “fish or cut bait” decision most likely within the next two months if not sooner.

Why is the Romney campaign spending in North Carolina?  To blunt any movement the Obama campaign is seeking in hopes of putting this state to bed now so they too can focus on truly persuadable voters in other states. That is all.

If the Obama campaign can move the needle enough to both justify staying in the state and force the Romney campaign to also stay in the state through October, the actual result in the state will be immaterial. It will be an Obama victory simply to make the Romney campaign sweat out a state Obama won by only a few votes simply because the McCain campaign wholly ignored it and GOP voters stayed home.  With Romney’s campaign not taking the state for granted and animosity towards Obama far higher than it was four years ago  there should be little chance for Obama to carry the state. But just in case, the Obama campaign is battling it out in North Carolina today. However, I do not expect them to be there for long…otherwise the Romney camp is in a more precarious position than than even they realize. ©

–”Keith Backer”

UPDATE: We are already seeing the slow fade from North Carolina: Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is II — North Carolina Dropping

Update II: I’d like to welcome the New York Times and Five-Thirty-Eight’s Nate Silver to the bandwagon. All Aboard! There’s plenty of room:

“People call lots of things toss-ups or swing states when they aren’t really, e.g. North Carolina.”

22 Trackbacks

  1. […] have seen arguments for New Mexico (with its popular GOP governor) and North Carolina (which Obama won in 2008) as being Battleground states, but I believe both states are fools errands […]

  2. […] campaign needs one more state and in this case they are targeting Iowa.  I’ll address the North Carolina spending in a full post later, but this is precautionary spending, not necessarily toss-up or Battleground worthy spending. Share […]

  3. […] both candidates have made this state a priority although months ago I had hopes (delusions?) for a North Carolina-like GOP reclamation of the Old Dominion state. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. […]

  4. […] may not be in North Carolina for long (but you knew that already): Polls suggest that North Carolina may be tough for Obama to win this year, but his campaign has […]

  5. […] on the top 10 political ad markets with a lot of week-over-week surprises including more evidence North Carolina is not a Battleground state (or at least won’t be […]

  6. […] figures we see that most of that ad spending is coming from the Romney campaign which I argue is to put the state to bed now so he can focus on legitimate Battlegrounds.  The week-over-week drop-off from the Obama campaign […]

  7. […] The campaign’s up-for-grabs states include Colorado, Iowa, Wisconsin, Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, Florida and New […]

  8. […] First Read again has the goods on campaign priorities with the top 10 political ad markets for the coming week.  Plenty of surprises again and North Carolina shuffles a few slots.  No North Carolina market is in the top five but they comprise four of the next five. This  increased state commitment would be consistent with what we saw from NBC/SMG Delta. Is this the ”go big or go home” push where the Obama campaign aggressively tries to move the needle for a couple weeks before shifting resources elsewhere?  We’ll be watching closely since we have argued from the beginning, North Carolina is not a Battleground State. […]

  9. By Quick Hits « Battleground Watch on June 15, 2012 at 1:54 am

    […] the drop in support among African-Americans for Obama tell you about North Carolina? It’s not a Battleground Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. This entry was written by […]

  10. By Quick Hits « Battleground Watch on June 18, 2012 at 10:11 am

    […] North Carolina poses uphill battle for Obama, though Charlotte is DNC host city…but you know that […]

  11. […] North Carolina has been a hot topic each week as I have argued from the beginning that it is not a Battleground state despite media misrepresentations to the contrary. Week after week, the fluctuation of ad spending […]

  12. […] this week. We have watched North Carolina closely since the beginning because we argued it is not a Battleground state and we expected the Obama campaign to pull up stakes sooner rather than later in this campaign. […]

  13. […] includes 2 non-Battlegrounds North Carolina and New […]

  14. […] My weekly “Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is” post is always a lot of work but one of the more illuminating news items.  A reader is able to genuinely identify campaign Battlegrounds versus campaign bravado that may say otherwise.  Notably, we have tracked the rise and fall of North Carolina‘s prominence from the very beginning and consistently predicted a precipitous drop in its importance sooner rather than later. Today’s report which First read failed to publish today (Booooooo!) was discussed on Chuck Todd’s Daily Rundown but none of the granularity was provided so in-depth analysis can’t be done.  We do know however, for the second week in a row, North Carolina is not in the top 10.  This is firming our long-held view that North Carolina is not a Battleground state. […]

  15. […] like you to believe are Battleground states but quite frankly they are not. I have spent more time disabusing this notion about North Carolina mainly because so much money and TV coverage is being spent on the state that easily misleads […]

  16. […] drops out after its brief return to the top-10, but regular readers are not surprised by its disappearance. Priority states for both campaigns is unsurprisingly Ohio and Virginia with three markets […]

  17. […] you know why, and the Obama campaign’s lack of ad spending in North Carolina tells you why North Carolina is not a Battleground State. A quick guide: RNC is the Republican National Committee, ROF is Restore Our Future (Romney Super […]

  18. […] only thing I don’t like about the list is 2 counties are in North Carolina which is not a Battleground in my opinion. In Palko’s defense, this story was originally published in April so his […]

  19. […] (NBC) about the missing North Carolina.  Let’s see how long it takes the media to concede North Carolina is not a Battleground now that the Obama campaign has.  My guess is at most they will painstakingly allude to the […]

  20. By Bye Bye North Carolina « Battleground Watch on October 17, 2012 at 1:58 pm

    […] political press is beginning the drumbeat of something readers at BattlegroundWatch.com knew all along: Where’s the Tar Heel love? By DAVID […]

  21. […] according to the official Obama campaign statements.  This includes Minnesota and not North Carolina.  I feel vindicated on both […]

  22. […] one week after this blog began its 5+ month odyssey (when I still could not walk and ate pain killers like […]

Leave a comment