Democrat Platform Removes Jerusalem as Capital of Israel

Considering how weak Obama is with Jews with his support for Israel routinely questioned, the changes in the Democrat Party platform is incredible:

The Democrat Party has removed a section of its 2008 Party Platform in the 2012 version recently released online — some key language in expressing support for the state of Israel. Below is the section missing from the 2012 document (h/t Twitter user @RJCHQ) :

The United States and its Quartet partners should continue to isolate Hamas until it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel’s right to exist, and abides by past agreements. Sustained American leadership for peace and security will require patient efforts and the personal commitment of the President of the United States. The creation of a Palestinian state through final status negotiations, together with an international compensation mechanism, should resolve the issue of Palestinian refugees by allowing them to settle there, rather than in Israel. All understand that it is unrealistic to expect the outcome of final status negotiations to be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949. Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel (emphasis added). The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations. It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths.

The above includes a laundry list of curious omissions that Jeff Dunetz rightly takes Democrats to task over, but the refusal to recognize the Israelis chosen capital of Jerusalem is staggering.

Here is Dunetz’s take-down of each sentence:

Each of these items are crucial to Israel, and each have been key areas of contention for those who believe this President has not been friendly to the Jewish State.

1. The United States should continue to isolate Hamas until it renounces terrorism. Is Obama preparing to give this group legitimacy? He has already done it with Hamas’s parent group, the Muslim Brotherhood, which recently took over Egypt’s parliament and presidency. Hamas’s partner in the U.S., CAIR, continues to be accepted by and promoted by Democrat members of Congress, despite an FBI warning.

2. …should resolve the issue of Palestinian refugees by allowing them to settle there, rather than in Israel. While the number of Palestinian refugees in 1949 was somewhere between 800,000-900,000, today the number is over 4 million. This group of refugees is the only example in history where the number has grown without a population shift (the UN counts the original refugees, their children, grandchildren, first cousin twice removed on their mother’s side, friends, etc. as refugees).

Since they cannot defeat Israel militarily, one of the Palestinians’ strategies is to flood the country with “refugees” so it will cease to exist as a Jewish state via election. That is why the 2008 platform included the refugee statement.

In keeping with their strategy, the Palestinians refuse to recognize Israel as a Jewish state. And while the President has said Israel is the Jewish state, he has been very careful not to call for worldwide recognition of Israel as the Jewish state. Is the removal of the “settle elsewhere” statement an indication that the President agrees with the Palestinian “flood Israel with refugees” strategy?

3. All understand that it is unrealistic to expect the outcome of final status negotiations to be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949. Obama walked away from that statement last May when he called for Israel to begin negotiations by agreeing to return to the 1949 lines. At the time, the Democrats said it was no change from previous policy; that was a lie. In 2008, Obama ran on the basis that a return to the 1949 lines was unrealistic. Why is that language is missing from this year’s document?

4. Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel. During a press briefing at the end of July, Jay Carney refused to outline the President’s position on Jerusalem. Eventually, the administration released a statement that Obama’s position remains unchanged; Jerusalem is not the capital of Israel because its final status has not yet been negotiated. That statement was a lie, but it is now codified with the omission from this year’s platform.

Notice that it that the campaign isn’t even saying the borders of Jerusalem are subject to negotiation, which would mean that the western part of the city would remain with the Jewish state. The Obama administration has removed all reference to Jerusalem from its platform, indicating a belief that the entire city is up for grabs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: