One More Reason I Don’t Blog PPP Polls

Multiple times I have pointed out that PPP polls are laden with pro-Obama and pro-Democrat bias. This is not an independent organization who happens to be Democrat leaning, they are a pro-Democrat polling firm with an agenda.

Today’s Missouri poll showing embattled Senate nominee Todd Akin leading Claire McCaskill by 1 point is a perfect example of this bias. Democrats greatly benefit if Akin stays in the race since he is both deeply flawed and now mortally wounded.  These flaws were the reason Democrats spent millions during the primary campaign to assist Akin to victory.  Now the only way Akin stays in the race is if he thinks he can still win.  So PPP runs a poll at their own expense, not for a paying client, that surveys Republican turnout far higher than it has ever been in order to construct a result to their liking. The party ID in Missouri in 2008 was D +6 (Dem:40, Rep: 34, Ind: 26). In 2004 the split was R +1 (Dem: 35, Rep: 36, Ind: 29).  Today’s poll? R +9!!! (Dem: 30, Rep: 39, Ind: 32).

This is a poll designed to give Akin comfort that he can still win despite the near unanimous consensus of conservative, moderate, Tea Party and establishment Republicans telling him to bow out. This was not a poll to gauge actual Missourians reaction to Akin’s idiocy.  It was an advocacy poll to buoy the candidate in order to help the Democrats.  I do not care to waste my time having to greatly scrutinize every single poll from an unabashedly biased source.  Hence I do not and will not blog PPP polls even if I like the results.

9 Trackbacks

  1. […] piece, Foster McCollum’s President claims Obama may lose Michigan at a time  (mid-June) when genuinely biased Public Policy Polling had Obama leading by an incredible 14 points. The pro-Obama media was […]

  2. […] survey: Iowa +0.2, Virginia +0.6, Ohio +0.7 (ex-PPP poll because how many times do you need to see their bias before you ignore them too), Wisconsin +1.4, Florida +1.7. And if I backed-out PPP from every […]

  3. […] As a reminder I don’t blog PPP polls because they purposely skew polls to further an agenda.  They’re not a polling firm who […]

  4. […] in a PPP poll. For any new readers I don’t blog PPP polls because they are openly biased and not credible. Today’s takedown at Ace of Spades is only the latest instance: [According to PPP's poll in […]

  5. […] knows I’ll blog polls whether they be good or bad for Mitt Romney with the noted exception of PPP who does advocacy and push polling rendering them not a credible organization.  But when a polls internals are so ludicrous, I […]

  6. […] of running self-funded advocacy polls to bolster the chances of Democratic candidates, leading the Battleground Watch blog to assert that, “PPP polls are laden with pro-Obama and pro-Democrat bias. This is not an independent […]

  7. […] of running self-funded advocacy polls to bolster the chances of Democratic candidates, leading the Battleground Watch blog to assert that, “PPP polls are laden with pro-Obama and pro-Democrat bias. This is not an independent […]

  8. […] of running self-funded advocacy polls to bolster the chances of Democratic candidates, leading the Battleground Watch blog to assert that, “PPP polls are laden with pro-Obama and pro-Democrat bias. This is not an independent […]

  9. […] of running self-funded advocacy polls to bolster the chances of Democratic candidates, leading the Battleground Watch blog to assert that, “PPP polls are laden with pro-Obama and pro-Democrat bias. This is not an independent […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: